Authors: Ayalew Tefferi, Saubia Fathima, Ali Khalid A. Alsugair, Fnu Aperna, Anuya Natu, Maymona G. Abdelmagid, Clifford M. Csizmar, Mark Gurney, Terra L. Lasho, Christy M. Finke, Abhishek A. Mangaonkar, Aref Al‐Kali, Animesh Pardanani, Kaaren K. Reichard, Rong He, Naseema Gangat, Mrinal M. Patnaik
Published: 2024-09-27
DOI: HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1002/ajh.27492
Keywords: No keywords found.
Abstract:
AbstractThe current study was inspired by observations from exploratory analyses of an institutional cohort with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML; N = 398) that revealed no instances of blast transformation in the seven patients with plant homeodomain finger protein 6 (PHF6) mutation (PHF6MUT). A subsequent Mayo Clinic enterprise‐wide database search identified 28 more cases with PHF6MUT. Compared with their wild‐type PHF6 counterparts (PHF6WT; N = 391), PHF6MUT cases (N = 35) were more likely to co‐express TET2 (89% vs. 45%; p < .01), RUNX1 (29% vs. 14%; p = .03), CBL (14% vs. 2%; p < .01), and U2AF1 (17% vs. 6%; p = .04) and less likely SRSF2 (23% vs. 45%; p < .01) mutation. They were also more likely to display loss of Y chromosome (LoY; 21% vs. 2%; p < .01) and platelets <100 × 109/L (83% vs. 51%; p < .01). Multivariable analysis identified PHF6MUT (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15–0.50) and DNMT3AMUT (HR 5.8, 95% CI 3.3–10.5) as the strongest molecular predictors of overall survival. The same was true for blast transformation‐free survival with corresponding HR (95% CI) of 0.08 (0.01–0.6) and 9.5 (3.8–23.5). At median 20 months follow‐up, blast transformation was documented in none of the 33 patients with PHF6MUT/DNMT3AWT but in 6 (32%) of 19 with DNMT3AMUT and 74 (20%) of 374 with PHF6WT/DNMT3AWT (p < .01). The specific molecular signatures sustained their significant predictive performance in the context of the CMML‐specific molecular prognostic model (CPSS‐mol). PHF6MUT identifies a unique subset of patients with CMML characterized by thrombocytopenia, higher prevalence of LoY, and superior prognosis.