Authors: Eleonora Lai, Enrico Palmas, Francesco Loi, Pina Ziranu, Stefano Mariani, Andrea Pretta, Alessandra Pia D'Agata, Veronica Dell'Utri, Giulia Papalexis, Giulia Deias, Daiana Rizzo, Dario Spanu, Giorgia Sanna, Giusy Moledda, Andrea Cadoni, Mattia Cucca, Clelia Donisi, Valeria Pusceddu, Marco Puzzoni, Mario Scartozzi
Published: 2024-06-04
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.e15575
Source: Full article
e15575 Background: Even if anti-angiogenic agents are crucial for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treatment, to date, no validated prognostic biomarkers are available. We conducted at our Centre a retrospective research to identify a prognostic tool to be applied in clinical practice in this population. Methods: We retrospectively collected laboratory, radiological and clinical data of mCRC pts treated with anti-angiogenic agents at the Medical Oncology Unit of Cagliari University Hospital (2018- 02/2024) in order to identify a potential prognostic tool. Statistical analysis was performed with MedCalc (survival distribution: Kaplan-Meier; survival comparison: log-rank test; cut-off: ROC curves; differences among variables: Chi-square test). Results: Globally, 33 mCRC pts were evaluated in our study (19 male, 14 female; 13 RAS wild-type, 22 left-sided primary). 10 were treated with anti-angiogenic drugs in the 1st-line, 13 in the 2nd-line (bevacizumab and aflibercept) and 10 in 1st-2nd line. Median OS was 39.5 months (m) (95%CI:28.2-41.3), median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 14.9 m (95%CI:9.5-18.5). Pts with lower platelet to lymphocyte ratio (P; ≤253; p < 0.0001, HR = 0,00000048; 95%CI 24.7-39.5 versus [vs] 95% CI 8.2-10.5), alkaline phosphatase (A; < 136 U/l; p = 0.0001, HR = 0.0001; 95%CI 12-39.5 vs 95% CI 8.2-10.5) and lactate dehydrogenasis (L; < 365 U/l; p < 0.0001, HR = 0.0000004; 95%CI 24.7-39.5 vs 95% CI 8.2-10.5) and higher monocyte count (M; > 0.3x103/μL; p = 0.0093, HR 0.01; 95%CI 26.5-39.5 vs 95%CI 8.2-24.7), showed a statistically improved OS. We created the “PALM score” and separated pts in two prognostic groups: good prognostic group (0 unfavorable variables: PALM = 0) and poor prognostic group (≥1 unfavorable variable, PALM = 1). OS was significantly improved in the good prognostic group (PALM = 0): 31.5 m (95%CI:24.7-39.5) vs 10.5 m (PALM = 1) (p = 0.0031, HR = 0.00006). Chi-square test revealed also a statistically significant correlation of upfront resection of primary tumor with the PALM score (73.9% of patients belonging to the PALM = 0 group had undergone surgery for primary tumor and all patients with resected primary belonged to the PALM = 0 group (p = 0.0352). Conclusions: Our research showed a promising prognostic role of easy-to-use PALM score tool in mCRC patients treated with anti-angiogenic drugs in a limited population at our center. Further prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to confirm our findings.