Authors: Nicole C. Mitchell, Oliver O. Thomas, Benjamin G. Meyer, Mirian Garcia‐Fernandez, Ke‐Jin Zhou, Patrick S. Grant, Peter G. Bruce, Richard Heap, Ruth Sayers, Robert A. House
Published: 2025-05-30
Source: Full article
AbstractLi‐rich disordered rocksalts are promising next‐generation cathode materials for Li‐ion batteries. Recent reports have shown it is also possible to obtain Na‐rich disordered rocksalts, however, it is currently poorly understood how the knowledge of the structural and redox chemistry translates from the Li‐rich to the Na‐rich analogs. Here, the properties of Li2MnO2F and Na2MnO2F are compared, which have different ion sizes (Li+ = 0.76 vs Na+ = 1.02 Å) but the same disordered rocksalt structure and stoichiometry. It is found that Na2MnO2F exhibits lower voltage Mn‐ and O‐redox couples, opening access to a wider compositional range within the same voltage limits. Furthermore, the intercalation mechanism switches from predominantly single‐phase solid solution behavior in Li2MnO2F to a two‐phase transition in Na2MnO2F, accompanied by a greater decrease in the average Mn─O/F bond length. Li2MnO2F retains its long‐range disordered rocksalt structure throughout the first cycle. In contrast, Na2MnO2F becomes completely amorphous during charge and develops a local structure characteristic of a post‐spinel. This amorphization is partially reversible on discharge. The results show how the ion intercalation behavior of disordered rocksalts differs dramatically when changing from Li‐ to Na‐ions and offers routes to control the electrochemical properties of these high‐energy‐density cathodes.