Authors: Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Mario Mandalà, Pier Francesco Ferrucci, Massimo Guidoboni, Piotr Rutkowski, Virginia Ferraresi, Ana Maria Arance, Michele Guida, Evaristo Maiello, Helen Gogas, Erika Richtig, Maria Teresa Fierro, Celeste Lebbe, Hildur Helgadottir, Ignacio Melero Bermejo, Giuseppe Palmieri, Diana Giannarelli, Antonio Maria Grimaldi, Reinhard Dummer, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni
Published: 2022-06-06
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.9535
Source: Full article
9535 Background: To investigate the best sequential strategy, we started the SECOMBIT study, a randomized three parallel arms phase 2 study (NCT02631447). We used the combination of encorafenib/binimetinib (E+B) as targeted therapy (T-T) and the combination of ipilimumab/nivolumab (I+N) as immunotherapy (I-O). We explored the two different sequences and the “sandwich” strategy with a short course of target therapy, switched by combo immunotherapy at the best response, and not at progression of disease. In our previous report we have observed a trend in favor of the arms where I-O was given as first, confirmed by the first report of the DreamSeq study, a phase III study which compared the two different sequences with T-T and I-O. Here we updated the study data with a subgroup analysis. Methods: From Nov 2016 to May 2019, 37 centers in 9 countries enrolled 251 patients with untreated, metastatic BRAFV600 melanoma. Patients were randomized to Arm A [E+B until PD, followed by I+N], or Arm B (I+N until PD, followed by E+B) or Arm C (E+B for 8 weeks, followed by I+N until PD, followed by E+B). The overall survival (OS) is the primary endpoint of the study. Secondary endpoints included total progression-free survival (tPFS), 2- and 3-years survival rate, best overall response rate, duration of response, biomarkers evaluation. Results: The study primary endpoint was met in each arm with at least 30 patients alive at 24 months. The median follow-up estimated with the reverse Kaplan-Meier method was 37.1 months (IQR: 32.8-46.4). The OS at 2 and 3 years was calculated in the three arms for all patients, and in the subgroups normal or elevate LDH level and < 3 or ≥ 3 metastatic sites. OS and tPFS rates at 2 and 3 years are shown in the table. Conclusions: With a 37.1 months median follow-up, 2 and 3-years OS as well as tPFS rates are higher in Arm B and C. In line with recent findings, the SECOMBIT results confirm a better trend in favor of Arm B and C treatment sequence. The analysis of the secondary endpoints is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02631447. [Table: see text]